Hi, In understand both
Rules Vs. Conditional actions (41 replies) Sat, 07/12/2008 - 17:11
- Re: Rules Vs. Conditional actions (01/23/2009 - 08:41)
- Max_Headroom wrote:Also, (01/23/2009 - 17:51)
- Yet another suggestion: 1) (12/24/2008 - 16:19)
- @zmove, cha0s Are you guys (12/18/2008 - 03:06)
- Re: Rules Vs. Conditional actions (11/26/2008 - 02:06)
- zmove wrote:I'm a little (12/01/2008 - 09:53)
- amitaibu@drupal.org (12/01/2008 - 18:05)
- Re: amitaibu@drupal.org (12/05/2008 - 05:11)
- Re: Re: amitaibu@drupal.org (12/05/2008 - 09:37)
- Re: Re: Re: amitaibu@drupal.org (12/07/2008 - 12:43)
- Re: Re: Re: Re: amitaibu@drupal.org (02/02/2009 - 07:36)
- Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: amitaibu@drupal.org (02/20/2009 - 15:04)
- Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: amitaibu@drupal.org (02/20/2009 - 15:56)
- Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: amitaibu@drupal.org (02/21/2009 - 03:30)
- Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: amitaibu@drupal.org (02/21/2009 - 12:21)
- Third Prong (03/03/2009 - 22:46)
- The Power of Rules (04/03/2009 - 07:56)
- i agree wtih moving CA to rules or better integrating them (05/11/2009 - 23:20)
- The Power of Rules (04/03/2009 - 07:56)
- Third Prong (03/03/2009 - 22:46)
- Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: amitaibu@drupal.org (02/21/2009 - 12:21)
- Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: amitaibu@drupal.org (02/21/2009 - 03:30)
- Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: amitaibu@drupal.org (02/20/2009 - 15:56)
- Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: amitaibu@drupal.org (02/20/2009 - 15:04)
- Re: Re: Re: Re: amitaibu@drupal.org (12/08/2008 - 03:06)
- thanks fago!
so, Ryan - (12/12/2008 - 07:23)
- Re: thanks fago!
so, Ryan - (12/15/2008 - 14:37)
- Re: Re: thanks fago! so, Ryan - (12/16/2008 - 12:48)
- Hi, I understand your (12/16/2008 - 02:27)
- Re: thanks fago!
so, Ryan - (12/15/2008 - 14:37)
- thanks fago!
so, Ryan - (12/12/2008 - 07:23)
- Re: Re: Re: Re: amitaibu@drupal.org (02/02/2009 - 07:36)
- Re: Re: Re: amitaibu@drupal.org (12/07/2008 - 12:43)
- Re: Re: amitaibu@drupal.org (12/05/2008 - 09:37)
- Re: amitaibu@drupal.org (12/03/2008 - 01:59)
- Re: amitaibu@drupal.org (12/05/2008 - 05:11)
- amitaibu@drupal.org (12/01/2008 - 18:05)
- zmove wrote: At least, when (12/01/2008 - 09:46)
- zmove wrote:I'm a little (12/01/2008 - 09:53)
- Hi, In understand both (07/15/2008 - 08:21)
- Re: Hi, In understand both (07/15/2008 - 09:12)
- CA: User has role(s) (12/16/2008 - 13:25)
- Re: CA: User has role(s) (12/17/2008 - 02:06)
- Re: Re: Hi, In understand both (07/21/2008 - 07:13)
- Re: Re: Re: Hi, In understand both (07/21/2008 - 11:31)
- Re: Re: Re: Re: Hi, In understand both (11/18/2008 - 12:37)
- Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Hi, In understand both (11/18/2008 - 13:49)
- Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Hi, In understand both (11/19/2008 - 03:30)
- Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Hi, In understand both (11/19/2008 - 09:48)
- Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Hi, In understand both (11/23/2008 - 10:47)
- Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Hi, In understand both (11/19/2008 - 09:48)
- Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Hi, In understand both (11/19/2008 - 03:30)
- Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Hi, In understand both (11/18/2008 - 13:49)
- Re: Re: Re: Re: Hi, In understand both (11/18/2008 - 12:37)
- Re: Re: Re: Hi, In understand both (07/21/2008 - 11:31)
- Hi, As I said before, I (07/15/2008 - 10:36)
- CA: User has role(s) (12/16/2008 - 13:25)
- Re: Hi, In understand both (07/15/2008 - 09:12)
- Re: Rules Vs. Conditional actions (07/14/2008 - 09:40)
- Re: Re: Rules Vs. Conditional actions (07/14/2008 - 14:20)
- Totally possible. We'll (07/14/2008 - 14:35)
- Re: Totally possible. We'll (07/15/2008 - 03:05)
- Totally possible. We'll (07/14/2008 - 14:35)
- Re: Re: Rules Vs. Conditional actions (07/14/2008 - 14:20)

Hi,
In understand both opinion of Ryan and Fago
I just would add that, even if the workflow integration brings some unwanted step for configuration (example shipping : You add the shipping quote, and then, you activate the workflow rules and define the conditions). Workflow allowed to define some usefull and complex conditions/actions without coding one single line.
I wonder, if Ubercart get rid of Workflow/rules, if it will be able to provide all the possibilities workflow already provide. Some workflow conditions and actions, not specially related to ubercart are very usefull. For example, get the user role to calculate a tax rate etc...
In addition, a lot of modules began to integrate workflow-ng, they all add some new actions, conditions, without the need for ubercart to add a single line of code. Example the organic group or nodeprofile integration, I don't use them with ubercart ATM, but it could be usefull for people to create a relation between a group and ubercart, and workflow is a good gateway for that.
If ubercart begin to write his own solution, this would involve that these module have to write one more integration to beeing usable with ubercart or ubercart to write extra code to beeing usable with these modules.
EDIT : I would like that, more than workflow, there is another dependencies/integration that it would be judicious to remove, it's the imagefield integration. This module took too much time to go out, and the issue queue for 6.x pratically seems dead. A very good alternative, more more reactive grown up, it's filefield with filefield image.